The Bio-Digital Divide: Digital trial adoption and the Bio-digital gap in Africa

Authors

  • Peter Ebot Eyong Department of Public Health and Hygiene, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Buea, P.O Box 63, Buea, Cameroon https://orcid.org/0009-0004-2964-1634 (unauthenticated)
  • Jacob Muruhukye School of Public Health, Makerere University, Uganda https://orcid.org/0009-0003-7534-7674 (unauthenticated)
  • Rita Ewah Mbah Directorate of Research and Grants, Kabale University, Uganda
  • Endurance Lum Ambe Department of Public Health and Hygiene, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Buea, P.O Box 63, Buea, Cameroon
  • Vahid Esangaya Ntoung-Mbi Department of Public Health and Hygiene, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Buea, P.O Box 63, Buea, Cameroon
  • Spritney Nashua Ninpa Department of Public Health and Hygiene, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Buea, P.O Box 63, Buea, Cameroon
  • Gloria Margaret Nanono School of Public Health, Makerere University, Uganda https://orcid.org/0009-0008-1714-2415 (unauthenticated)

Abstract

Research question

In health technology innovation, does the adoption of decentralized and digital trial method indicate a growing bio-digital gap between African and high-income research ecosystems?

Methods: This review analyzed ClinicalTrial.gov records up to Mach 2026, evaluating digital trail components across Africa (268 trials) and United states (4,540 trials) through keyword searches for wearable, virtual and decentralized trial elements. Investigators reported the digital adoption rate as primary indicator of technological readiness.

Results: The findings showed that only 1.1% of rate in Africa included digital features which was 17 times lower compared to the rate of United states, suggesting continued dependence on traditional site-based research approach. The shift towards mobile and wearable technologies in Europe during the Covid-19 period appears to have widened this gap [1] from estimated ten-fold to seventen-fold between 2019 and 2025.

Interpretation:  African patients risk exclusion from the next generation of decentralized clinical innovation if this gap is not addressed [2,3]. These findings quantify the bio-digital divide as a measurable infrastructure deficit. The interpretation is limited by the lack of evolving terminology of digital trial components

 

Note Block

Dashboard Results: https://mahmood726-cyber.github.io/africa-e156-students/health-disease/dashboards/digital-transformation.html

Code: https://mahmood726-cyber.github.io/africa-e156-students/health-disease/code/digital-transformation.py

References

References

1. Izmailova ES, Ellis R, Benko C. Remote Monitoring in Clinical Trials During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Clinical and Translational Science. 2020;13(5):838–41.

2. Nebie EI, Sawadogo HN, Eeuwijk P van, Signorell A, Reus E, Utzinger J, Burri C. Opportunities and challenges for decentralised clinical trials in sub-Saharan Africa: a qualitative study. 2023;

3. Ejigu DA, Fekadu A, Makonnen E, Hervé J, Eaton N, Conradie A, Liebenberg C, Demarest H, Croucher K, Manyazewal T. Assessing the adoption and impact of decentralized clinical trial approaches in Africa: a multi-country survey. 2026;

Visual abstract

Published

2026-06-06 — Updated on 2026-06-16

Versions

Issue

Section

E156 Research Letter

How to Cite

The Bio-Digital Divide: Digital trial adoption and the Bio-digital gap in Africa. (2026). Synthesis, 2(7). https://synthesis-medicine.org/index.php/journal/article/view/75 (Original work published 2026)

Most read articles by the same author(s)