Array

Versions

PDF

Keywords

PrEP initiation; HIV prevention; sub-Saharan Africa; priority populations; systematic review; meta-analysis.

How to Cite

Muhumuza, C., Philbert, R., & Bridget, T. (2026). Effectiveness of PrEP Initiation Among Priority Populations in Sub-Saharan Africa: Evidence from a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Synthēsis, 8(1). Retrieved from https://synthesis-medicine.org/index.php/journal/article/view/96 (Original work published June 6, 2026)

Abstract

Effectiveness of PrEP Initiation Among Priority Populations in Sub-Saharan Africa: Evidence from a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND:
Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is a key HIV prevention strategy for priority populations in sub-Saharan Africa, where HIV incidence remains high and access to prevention services is influenced by stigma, health system constraints, and variability in service delivery.

AIM:
To assess the effectiveness of PrEP initiation strategies compared with standard-of-care HIV prevention approaches among priority populations in sub-Saharan Africa.

METHODS:
Evidence from multiple trials was systematically synthesized using logit transformations and random-effects modelling. Statistical heterogeneity was assessed using the I² statistic.

RESULTS:
The pooled estimate demonstrated high PrEP initiation across included studies, with a 95% confidence interval of 0.82 to 0.95, indicating consistently strong uptake of PrEP among priority populations. Moderate heterogeneity was observed (I²), suggesting variability in uptake across studies due to differences in delivery models, population characteristics, and implementation settings. Subgroup analyses indicated that community-based and integrated service delivery models achieved higher initiation rates compared to facility-based standard-of-care approaches. Studies that incorporated tailored demand creation strategies, peer support, and differentiated service delivery approaches reported particularly high uptake, especially among adolescent girls and young women and serodiscordant couples. In contrast, lower initiation rates were observed in settings with limited health system capacity or where PrEP awareness was low. Overall, multivariable analyses confirmed that innovative PrEP delivery approaches significantly outperformed standard prevention services across diverse geographical contexts.

CONCLUSION: PrEP initiation strategies are effective in increasing access to HIV prevention among priority populations in sub-Saharan Africa. However, scale-up should be context-specific, taking into account health system capacity, implementation context, and infrastructure variability.

KEYWORDS: PrEP initiation; HIV prevention; sub-Saharan Africa; priority populations; systematic review; meta-analysis.

References:

  1. Baeten JM, Donnell D, Ndase P, et al. Antiretroviral prophylaxis for HIV prevention in heterosexual men and women. New England Journal of Medicine. 2012;367(5):399–410.
  2. Hodges-Mameletzis I, Dalal S, Msimanga-Radebe B, et al. Going global: the adoption of the WHO policy on pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV prevention. Journal of the International AIDS Society. 2018;21(Suppl 7):e25238.
  3. Heffron R, Ngure K, Odoyo J, et al. Pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV-negative persons with partners living with HIV: uptake, use, and effectiveness in an open-label demonstration project in East Africa. The Lancet HIV. 2017;4(11):e523–e530.
  4. Mpirirwe R, Segawa I, Ojiambo KO, et al. HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis uptake, retention and adherence among female sex workers in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    BMJ Open. 2024;14:e076545.

  5. Mayanja Y, Kayesu I, Nabalwanyi Z, et al. A qualitative study of peer education experiences and oral pre-exposure prophylaxis use among adolescent girls and young women in Kampala, Uganda.
    Frontiers in Public Health. 2025.

  6. Mayer CM, et al. Distance to clinic is a barrier to PrEP uptake and retention in rural Uganda. Journal of the International AIDS Society. 2019;22:e25276.

  7. Atujuna M, et al. Adolescent girls and young women’s choice for HIV prevention products in a cross-over randomized clinical trial in South Africa, Uganda, and Zimbabwe. PLOS One. 2024.

  8. Lunkuse JF, Kamacooko O, Muturi-Kioi V, et al. Low awareness of oral and injectable PrEP among high-risk adolescent girls and young women in Kampala, Uganda. BMC Infectious Diseases. 2022.

PDF

References

References:

1. Baeten JM, Donnell D, Ndase P, et al. Antiretroviral prophylaxis for HIV prevention in heterosexual men and women. New England Journal of Medicine. 2012;367(5):399–410.

2. Hodges-Mameletzis I, Dalal S, Msimanga-Radebe B, et al. Going global: the adoption of the WHO policy on pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV prevention. Journal of the International AIDS Society. 2018;21(Suppl 7):e25238.

3. Heffron R, Ngure K, Odoyo J, et al. Pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV-negative persons with partners living with HIV: uptake, use, and effectiveness in an open-label demonstration project in East Africa. The Lancet HIV. 2017;4(11):e523–e530.

4. Mpirirwe R, Segawa I, Ojiambo KO, et al. HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis uptake, retention and adherence among female sex workers in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BMJ Open. 2024;14:e076545.

5. Mayanja Y, Kayesu I, Nabalwanyi Z, et al. A qualitative study of peer education experiences and oral pre-exposure prophylaxis use among adolescent girls and young women in Kampala, Uganda.

Frontiers in Public Health. 2025.

6. Mayer CM, et al. Distance to clinic is a barrier to PrEP uptake and retention in rural Uganda. Journal of the International AIDS Society. 2019;22:e25276.

7. Atujuna M, et al. Adolescent girls and young women’s choice for HIV prevention products in a cross-over randomized clinical trial in South Africa, Uganda, and Zimbabwe. PLOS One. 2024.

8. Lunkuse JF, Kamacooko O, Muturi-Kioi V, et al. Low awareness of oral and injectable PrEP among high-risk adolescent girls and young women in Kampala, Uganda. BMC Infectious Diseases. 2022.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2026 Christine Muhumuza, Mahmood Ahmad, Ruchius Philbert, Tamale Bridget