Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Trials: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Structural Inequities in African and United States Research Investment

Authors

Abstract

We conducted a cross-sectional audit of interventional studies registered on ClinicalTrials.gov through April 2026, comparing Africa with the United States (ClinicalTrials.gov, n.d.).
Using registry-derived counts, we estimated trial rates, rate ratios, and bootstrap confidence intervals to quantify disparities in AI/ML trial activity.
Africa contributed 10 eligible trials versus 1,436 in the United States, representing an approximately 144-fold difference in absolute counts and a markedly lower population-adjusted trial rate.
Although overall trial registrations in Africa have increased over time, trends indicate persistent underrepresentation in advanced methodological studies.
Across African research settings, limited digital infrastructure and analytic capacity have been documented as key barriers to adoption of AI-driven approaches (World Health Organization, 2021; World Health Organization Regional Office for Africa, 2023).
These findings highlight structural inequities in research investment, though interpretation is limited by reliance on a single registry and incomplete capture of non-English trial databases.

Visual abstract

Published

2026-06-06 — Updated on 2026-06-16

Versions

Issue

Section

E156 Research Letter

How to Cite

Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Trials: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Structural Inequities in African and United States Research Investment. (2026). Synthesis, 2(5). https://synthesis-medicine.org/index.php/journal/article/view/45 (Original work published 2026)

Most read articles by the same author(s)