WHO Alignment and Disease Burden Gaps

Authors

  • Michael Bosiako Antwi 1. Centre for Research in Applied Biology, University of Energy and Natural Resources
  • Njeodo Njongang Vigny
  • Shamim Nabidda Makerere University School of Public Health
  • Tukamushaba Bruce Makerere University School of Public Health
  • Christine Muhumuza
  • Fadumo Said Hassan Makerere University School of Public Health
  • Ruchius Philbert Makerere University School of Public Health
  • Rhoda Chikula Makerere University School of Public Health
  • Amina Mohamud Fidow Makerere University School of Public Health
  • Ssenfuma Ronnie Makerere University School of Public Health

Keywords:

Clinical trials, Africa, disease burden, neglected tropical diseases, World Health Organization

Abstract

In the context of global health prioritization, does Africa's clinical trial portfolio correspond with the World Health Organization (WHO) priority disease list and the health aims of the Sustainable Development Goals? In this alignment analysis, condition-specific trial volumes from 23,873 African registrations on ClinicalTrials.gov were compared to SDG 3 priority conditions and WHO important medications. HIV (1,793 trials), malaria (531 trials), and tuberculosis (489 trials) predominated Africa's trial portfolio, while WHO-designated priorities such as mental health (174 trials), neglected tropical diseases (12 trials), and epilepsy (73 trials) were neglected. Non-communicable diseases, such as diabetes (760), cancer (2,182), and cardiovascular disease (1,426), have received research focus that is out of step with their increasing role in African mortality. Only studies on tuberculosis and malaria revealed that Africa had a higher trial density than the world average. In Ghana, morbidity and mortality associated with the evolving disease burden are increasing, yet the volume of clinical trials remains limited.These results show a systematic gap between WHO priorities and the epidemiological transition and Africa's research portfolio. The mapping between WHO priority classifications and ClinicalTrials.gov condition categories restricts interpretation.

References

1. Kyu, H. H., Maddison, E. R., Henry, N. J., Mumford, J. E., Barber, R., Shields, C., Brown, J. C., Nguyen, G., Carter, A., & Wolock, T. M. (2018). The global burden of tuberculosis: results from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. The Lancet Infectious Diseases,

18(3), 261–284.

2. Matovu, B., Takuwa, M., Mpaata, C. N., Kiwanuka, N., Mugaga, J., Nalwoga, R. P., Kamuhanda, S., Kworekwa, P., Mulindwa, B., & Jjuuko, G. W. (2024). A compound analysis of medical device clinical trials registered in Africa on clinicaltrials. gov. Trials,

25(1), 658.

3. World Health Organization. "World Health Statistics 2024." WHO, Geneva

Published

2026-06-06 — Updated on 2026-06-16

Versions

Issue

Section

Research Article

How to Cite

WHO Alignment and Disease Burden Gaps. (2026). Synthesis, 2(4). https://synthesis-medicine.org/index.php/journal/article/view/39 (Original work published 2026)

Similar Articles

31-40 of 78

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>