This is an outdated version published on 2026-06-15. Read the most recent version.

Rigorous Bivariate Synthesis of Benefit-Risk Profiles for Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Atrial Fibrillation

Authors

  • Oluwatomi Olukoya GMC
  • Khaing Mar Lwin
  • Ata Ul Hayee Sohail

Abstract

Selection of anticoagulant therapy relies on a balance between ischemic stroke prevention (the benefit) and (the risk) of major bleeding.[1] This analysis highlights a bivariate random effect meta-analysis of the four key Phase III trials. Making a comparison of Direct Oral Anticoagulant (DOACs) versus warfarin drawing on the four key Phase III trials:RE-LY, ROCKET-AF, ARISTOTLE, and ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48. This is done by incorporating modern small sample adjustments and conformal prediction intervals, in order to provide a strengthened framework for evidence based decision making under uncertainty.

References

1. Hartung, J., & Knapp, G. (2001). A refined method for the meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials with binary outcome.2Statistics in Medicine, 20(24), 3875-3889.

2. Riley, R. D., et al. (2017). Multivariate and network meta-analysis of multiple outcomes and multiple treatments: rationale, concepts, and examples.3 BMJ, 358, j3932.

3. Viechtbauer, W. (2005). Bias and efficiency of meta-analytic variance estimators in the random-effects model.4 Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 30(3), 261-293.

4. Vovk, V., Gammerman, A., & Shafer, G. (2005). Algorithmic Learning in a Random World.5 Springer Science & Business Media.

Published

2026-04-12 — Updated on 2026-06-15

Versions

Issue

Section

Methods Note

How to Cite

Rigorous Bivariate Synthesis of Benefit-Risk Profiles for Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Atrial Fibrillation. (2026). Synthēsis, 1(1). https://synthesis-medicine.org/index.php/journal/article/view/12 (Original work published 2026)

Most read articles by the same author(s)